Hello Experts
I want to automate the process of refreshing the Queues in EWM and ECC which are stuck in SMQ1 , primarily due to lock issues etc and where we have to just execute the Queue to clear it.
Also is there functionality available to get alerts if the stuck Queue exceed some specified limit.
We are using SAP SCM 7.0 (EWM) and SAP ECC 6.0(ECC).
Thanks
Akhil
Hello ,
I am trying to configure process of Kit to stock. I have created BOM material and after releaseing production order system is creating Delivery type DOG which is getting replicated in SAP EWM.
In many references i have seen that delivery of type HOD is created. Can you tell me the difference between these two?
I have not created control cycle for these materials?
Please guide
Thanks,
Pramod
Hi experts,
we have one plant in EWM. One sales org assigend to this plant in ERP, so in delivery note printed in EWM, footline is based on this sales org.
Now another sales org is delivering from this plant (via intercompany business)...so also footline for example should show data from this different sales org.
How to handle this? Maybe I'm blind, but didn't find a solution until now.
Thanks
Michael
while extracting data from table /scdl/db_refdoc is taking long times.
some this this is going for dump also.
in selection parameters of reference document - I have provided only one ERP inbound delivery document number.
any specific reasons ?
Sastry
Dear expert,
I have a question about the RF manual Selection by WO.
e.g.
1. a warehouse order is assigned to queue Q-01-01
2. resource 'ABC' is assigned to resource group 'GRP_01'
3. resource group 'GRP_01' is assign to queue Q-02-02
Can the resource 'ABC' take this warehouse order by RF menu 'Selection by WO'?
Thanks and Kind Regards,
Clark
Hello Experts,
I have created ID in ECC and it gives the message successfully distributed to WMS.
But when i check in EWM system i didn't find any document.
Also i checked both smq1 and smq2 but didn't get any queue.
When i checked SLG1 i found below entries :
Please check if anybody have came across this issue .
Regards,
Hi Experts,
Are we supposed to schedule batch jobs using below programs for CIFing delta changes?
1) RIMODDEL - Delete old inactive model if any (Optional)
2) RIMODINI - Initial data transfer
3) RIMODGEN - New model generation
4) RIMODAC2 - New model activation
Or is there alternate method in EWM?
Please advice.
Hi Experts,
Warehouse task not creating with right quantity for some products
For example suppose we have quantity of 240 CS and need to create 6 Warehouse tasks of 40 cs each but in the system only 4 warehouse tasks are created as below
80 cs
80 cs
40 cs
40 cs
So the workaround done is the tasks are cancelled for 80 cs and the tasks are created manually of 40 cs each.
Can you please throw some light on the issue to get what is the exact issue over here.
Regards,
Priya
Hi All,
Currently, in my EWM system, we have Physical Inventory document number range maintained for 2015 year and as we are in 2016, we are unable to create new PI documents. I know that we need to maintain new PI number range for 2016 year. However, I am in a confusion if I need to maintain it manually or there is any standard program to do it?
I checked in google and cannot find any standard program to maintain PI number range based on year. However, I need your expert advise on this.
Thank You,
Ravi
Hello Everyone,
One of my colleague recently received some raw materials using MIGO but somehow without entering any warehouse number. So we are now unable to see this materials in any warehouse and also unable to consume them in any way. Also we cannot transfer them to any warehouse or make a cancellation according to the material number. The system says the materials cannot be found. But when I take a report of 101 movements ay MB51, I can see clearly the materials are received but without any indicated warehouse number.
Could you please show me a way to access these materials and somehow transfer them back to the raw materials warehouse? And could you also suggest us what kind of corrective measures should we take for avoiding this kind of undesired situation in the future?
And one more thing; shouldn't SAP block us making such an incorrect receive with some red errors?
Thanks in adnavce for your help,
Fatih Savas
Hi Experts,
Good Day.
We are unable to post the PGR.
Please advise.
Thank You.
Hi Experts,
While doing bin to bin from over flow bin to H0* bin for some products it gives error as
" No partial quantities can be stored in storage type H0*
Can you let us know the issue is and provide the steps how to solve this one
Regards,
Supriya.
Hello,
I need EWM Roadmap for my presentation. I searched forum but only found strategy till 2014 which i already have.
Maybe Matthias would help? 
Basic words can also help(must be official). Because i have to translate them into Turkish, i can't use your document directly.
What i require;
- Main goals about next releases
- Future plans(for the next 3 years)?
Please help,
Best regards.
Serhan.
Hi Everyone.
Please support me on below issue.
I am transferring product(qty = 280, which is equal to 4 pallets) from distribution plant/SL to PSA SL.
I am expecting system should create 4 WT and so 4 WO. But system is creating only 1 WT and so 1 WO.
More detail:
WPT used:4ABC(lets say) Tsf FG Rework to Prod Supply
WPT is having:
WO Rule :HU03
Activity: STCH
Also.
Creation Cat.: Pick Path
Item Filter HU03
Limit Value Type: WT
Limit MX01 (Maximum One Item)
Max. Itm per WO 1
Max. CGr per WO 0
Max.CGrp per HU 0
Max. No. of HUs 0
Min. WTs per HU 0
Max. WTs per HU 0
Also, Please find the activity log for WO creation:
Warehouse order creation started
Warehouse order creation is processing:
1 WTs with directly assigned creation rule
0 WTs with search sequence for determining creation rules
Warehouse order creation called up within a process
Creation rule HU03 used for 1 WTs
Creation rule HU03 is of the type "Pick Path"
Item filter HU03 checked
WT 1XXXXX passed the filter
1 WTs passed, 0 WTs did not pass item filter HU03
Inbound WT sorting rule PIPA used
1 WTs passed, 0 did not pass subtotal filter
Limit value MX01 used for 1 warehouse tasks
Warehouse task 1XXXXX passed limit value
Maximum limit value for 1 warehouse tasks was adhered to
Limit values: current values for these 1 warehouse tasks
Limits for items: minimum 0, maximum 1, current 1
Limits for number of HUs: maximum 999, current 0
Resource management called with queue A.INT.FG
Content provider 02 determined for warehouse order 9639
Warehouse order 9XXXXcreated on the basis of creation rule HU03 with 1 WTs
Please support.
Let me know if more information is required.
Hi Gurus,
Access sequence- Determination should happen based on Warehouse process type and activity area.
But sytem checks for some other combination in CAPDET. Let me know if anybody else have faced a similar issue.
Regards,
Venky
Hello Experts
I want to automate the process of refreshing the Queues in EWM and ECC which are stuck in SMQ1 , primarily due to lock issues etc and where we have to just execute the Queue to clear it.
Also is there functionality available to get alerts if the stuck Queue exceed some specified limit.
We are using SAP SCM 7.0 (EWM) and SAP ECC 6.0(ECC).
Thanks
Akhil
Hello Experts,
I am working on multiple cases of deconsolidation with rule based settings (where attribute for deco HU is set to 2).I would like to understand system behaviour on two of the cases i tested-
Case 1 : Two products packed in one HU going to bins in same AA.My storage type says HU 's are required.Here system is sending products to deconsolidation work center because i have two final WT for one HU.
Case 2 :Two products packed in one HU going to one common storage type.My storage type says HU 's not required.I have also checked do not putaway HU's check box.Here system is sending products to deconsolidation work center again.System wise i think again rule based settings are dominating and as i have two WT's for one HU they are going for deconsolidation. But logically this is not correct.When both products are going to one bin there is no need for deconsoliation.Is it possible to bypass decon. and do distributive putaway here?
I know there are a lot of algorithms that goes in deconsolidation. Can someone throw some light on how case two can be achieved.
Thanks!!
Hi All,
Can anyone tell me to how to automate the delivery process for inbound delivery?
Is there any feasibility in the system?
Thanks
SD
Hallo,
I'm interested in the new MFS solution at SAP EWM. I havent found much information about that.
My question: Do I need SAP Plant Connectivity to realize SAP EWM - MFS? Or PCo is only needed to work with SAP MII?
Thanks in advance.
Regards!
erdalt
Hi All,
I am stuck in a putaway scenario.
The idea is to have one storage type for all pallets and have one WH task par pallet. For all the remaining loose quantities we can have a single line.
I have created a packaging specification with first level as EA and a second level as PAL. Quantity classification E and P are maintained for the respective levels and corresponding Operative UOM EA and PAL are maintained
For storage type X I have maintained at the rounding to single unit ( Value 2)
For Storage type Y i have maintained no rounding
the putaway search sequence uses respective qty classification to move the stock to either storage type X or Y based on Qty.
I have maintained the condition record for procedure 0WHT.
Assuming 10 EA equals 1 PAL
When i do a inbound for 55 PAL. The system determines the packaging specification and creates a putaway of 5.5 PAL into storage type X it is not rounding it to single units
Apparently the rounding into whole units at storage type level play a role in stock removal only (its under that section)
However if i change the setting at warehouse process type level. Where we have the same config and maintain rounding value as 2 then the system is generating 10 WH task. 1 each for 5 PALs and 1 each for 5 loose pick. This doesn't help me as its generating 5 WH task also for the loose pieces. I want the control at storage type level rather then at warehouse process type level. Is there any way i can achieve rounding for only one storage type during putaway
Also if i read the field help the Putaway qty classification at storage type level or at the product master level (storage type data) along with the packaging specification decides what is the operative UOM. but looks like the field " putaway qty classification" is not playing any role in putaway as the system behaves the same irrespective of wheter i maintain the field or not.
Thanks for reading it through and any suggestion provided!!