Morning experts,

I'm a little bit confused at the moment:

I have a delivery note in ERP system, X positions, for Spain

When this dnote is distributed to EWM, it automatically gets an extra text position, without any reference to ERP document:

As you can see position is completly empty, no reference, ...

This happens only for Spain orders, thought maybe somtehing wrong with the customer/business partner, but can't find anything different to "normal" customers.

Any ideas what can happen here?

Thanks

Michael

Hi,

Since creation of freight order in TM triggers TU document in EWM. Can the experts throw light in EWM wheather we have reference ID of freight order/freight unit coming from TM.

Hi experts !

Can someone indicate which object/configuration field impacts the value of field 'Automatic Qty Adjustment' at item level of an internal stock transfer order please ? Default value is initial, and I'd need it to be 'A - Quantity Adjustment During Creation of Warehouse Task' to allow overpicking

Thank you

Regards

G.Urbain

SAP eWM 2-way integration simulation tools

I need your help to get implementation details on the below topic.

My client is implementing SAP eWM and the Knapp/SSI Schafer warehouse automation system

I'm looking for a test platform to test and simulate the two-way integration between the systems.

In particular, the movements of totes through the warehouse and their interaction with printers, rails, servers, racks, operatives.

There are OEM simulation software (e.g. Knapp KiSoft Sandbox) to emulate the warehouse side of the integration and simulate the statistical delays and queues associated with the printer and totes. 

the simulation software should help to simulate the Idoc messages to and from the SAP and warehouse machines.

Does anyone have any examples of this being implemented with OEM simulation software eg KiSoft or other ?  

Could you please help to get the implementation details like testing approach used during the testing phases like development, intergration, regresssion and UAT test.

Hi Gurus,

I am currently configuring a warehouse for a client who has the following stock placement and stock removal requirements:

Stock Placement:

1. Putaway to dedicated bin (Bins will be dedicated to specific materials) - All bins have a fixed capacity and must not exceed this fixed capacity

2. Putaway to a Bin defined as “Promotion” – No capacity check and mixed storage

3. Putaway to bins defined as “Shipping Lanes” – Max capacity 30 PAL and mixed storage allowed

Stock Removal:

1. Check  “Shipping Lanes”

2. Check “Promotion”

3. Check Fixed Bins

I have configured the shipping lanes as bulk storage with capacity as 30 in the block structure. For the promotion bin I have defined stock placement strategy as Open Storage and strategy Fix Bins for the dedicated bin scenario. The warehouse is SU managed.

The issue is with regards to stock removal from Open Storage and Fixed Bins. We do not want a SU to be proposed when a Transfer Order is created through LT03. I know that bulk storage does not propose the SU's while stock removal.

Is there anyway for me to overwrite the SU while creating the TO or have a custom strategy to not propose the SU. Please help, this is urgent.

Thanks,

Adi

Hi,

Is there a way to add additional field in LX02 initial screen? Our client wants to include additional field for material.

Thanks,

Jojo

Hi everyone,

Scenario:-  I have create inbound delivery & Create the task for unload. After the unload task confirmed  system not create another task

And one queue stuck on SMQ2 and I check the log .  Please advise what to do, perhaps Im missing some config or settings.

Below is the  log:

*****   HU WT Creation for HU 2676    *****

Storage control active for HU 2676 with storage process ZDEC

***** Putaway Warehouse Task Creation for HU 2676 - Start

*****   Product WT Creation    *****

For warehouse request PDI 963 10

For product 10000883; quantity 45.00000000000000 EA

*****   Determine source data - start  *****

Source HU 2676 entered; storage type: ; storage bin:

Determining source data with storage type:9010, section:, bin:GR-ZONE, HU:2676

Source storage type 9010 defined

Storage type search fully defined: No entry found

Storage type search with wildcard: No entry found

Determine stock in source storage type 9010

Determine stock in source storage bin GR-ZONE

Storage bin GR-ZONE is not assigned to any physical inventory area

Source storage bin GR-ZONE determined in storage type 9010

Handling unit type E1 determined

*****   Determine destination data - start *****

Storage type search fully defined: No entry found

Storage type search with wild card: Search sequence KBSS and rule 2 found

Storage type search sequence KBSS found

Destination storage section check is not active in storage type KB30

HU type check is not active in storage type KB30

Split during putaway active for storage type KB30

Destination storage section check is not active in storage type GENR

HU type check is not active in storage type GENR

Alternatives during bin search: 1st alt. Stor.Bin Type, 2nd alt. Storage Sec., 3rd alt. StorType

Access table for bin search:

Storage type: KB30 storage section: **** bin type: T030 whse pos. eval.: 00000

Storage type: KB30 storage section: **** bin type:  whse pos. eval.: 00000

Storage type: GENR storage section: **** bin type:  whse pos. eval.: 00000

Start of destination bin search

Stor.type: KB30, stor.area: ****, bin type: T030, stock mvmt: 00000 being examined

Storage type KB30: HUs not allowed

Standard putaway behavior (storage type KB30)

Split during putaway active for storage type KB30

Determining a fixed bin (storage type KB30)

Maximum weight (incl. tolerance) for LocationK01-08-C01 was exceeded by 3,500 KG

Maximum weight (incl. tolerance) for LocationK01-08-C01 was exceeded by 3,500 KG

Capacity check against storage bin K01-08-C01

Weight: 1,000 KG are checked

against free capacity 1,000 KG with tolerance 0 KG

Partial qty 10.00000000000000 is put away in storage bin K01-08-C01 (product:10000883,storage type:KB30)

Split Occurred - Detailed information

Stor. bin K01-08-C01 found and assigned to product 10000883 as a fixed bin

HU  was checked successfully

Dest. QTY 10.00000000000000 EA was determined (storage type: KB30, storage bin:K01-08-C01)

*****   Determine source data - start  *****

Source HU 2676 entered; storage type: ; storage bin:

Determining source data with storage type:9010, section:, bin:GR-ZONE, HU:2676

Source storage type 9010 defined

Storage type search fully defined: No entry found

Storage type search with wildcard: No entry found

Determine stock in source storage type 9010

Determine stock in source storage bin GR-ZONE

Storage bin GR-ZONE is not assigned to any physical inventory area

Source storage bin GR-ZONE determined in storage type 9010

*****   Determine destination data - start *****

Storage type search fully defined: No entry found

Storage type search with wild card: Search sequence KBSS and rule 2 found

Storage type search sequence KBSS found

Destination storage section check is not active in storage type KB30

HU type check is not active in storage type KB30

Split during putaway active for storage type KB30

Destination storage section check is not active in storage type GENR

HU type check is not active in storage type GENR

Alternatives during bin search: 1st alt. Stor.Bin Type, 2nd alt. Storage Sec., 3rd alt. StorType

Access table for bin search:

Storage type: KB30 storage section: **** bin type: T030 whse pos. eval.: 00000

Storage type: KB30 storage section: **** bin type:  whse pos. eval.: 00000

Storage type: GENR storage section: **** bin type:  whse pos. eval.: 00000

Start of destination bin search

Stor.type: KB30, stor.area: ****, bin type: T030, stock mvmt: 00000 being examined

Storage type KB30: HUs not allowed

Standard putaway behavior (storage type KB30)

Split during putaway active for storage type KB30

Determining a fixed bin (storage type KB30)

Mixed storage in HU for storage type KB30 failed due to BAdI implementation 

Maximum weight (incl. tolerance) for LocationK01-08-D01 was exceeded by 2,500 KG

Capacity check against storage bin K01-08-D01

Weight: 1,000 KG are checked

against free capacity 1,000 KG with tolerance 0 KG

Partial qty 10.00000000000000 is put away in storage bin K01-08-D01 (product:10000883,storage type:KB30)

Split Occurred - Detailed information

Stor. bin K01-08-D01 found and assigned to product 10000883 as a fixed bin

HU  was checked successfully

Dest. QTY 10.00000000000000 EA was determined (storage type: KB30, storage bin:K01-08-D01)

*****   Determine source data - start  *****

Source HU 2676 entered; storage type: ; storage bin:

Determining source data with storage type:9010, section:, bin:GR-ZONE, HU:2676

Source storage type 9010 defined

Storage type search fully defined: No entry found

Storage type search with wildcard: No entry found

Determine stock in source storage type 9010

Determine stock in source storage bin GR-ZONE

Storage bin GR-ZONE is not assigned to any physical inventory area

Source storage bin GR-ZONE determined in storage type 9010

*****   Determine destination data - start *****

Storage type search fully defined: No entry found

Storage type search with wild card: Search sequence KBSS and rule 2 found

Storage type search sequence KBSS found

Destination storage section check is not active in storage type KB30

HU type check is not active in storage type KB30

Split during putaway active for storage type KB30

Destination storage section check is not active in storage type GENR

HU type check is not active in storage type GENR

Alternatives during bin search: 1st alt. Stor.Bin Type, 2nd alt. Storage Sec., 3rd alt. StorType

Access table for bin search:

Storage type: KB30 storage section: **** bin type: T030 whse pos. eval.: 00000

Storage type: KB30 storage section: **** bin type:  whse pos. eval.: 00000

Storage type: GENR storage section: **** bin type:  whse pos. eval.: 00000

Start of destination bin search

Stor.type: KB30, stor.area: ****, bin type: T030, stock mvmt: 00000 being examined

Storage type KB30: HUs not allowed

Standard putaway behavior (storage type KB30)

Split during putaway active for storage type KB30

Determining a fixed bin (storage type KB30)

Mixed storage in HU for storage type KB30 failed due to BAdI implementation 

Mixed storage in HU for storage type KB30 failed due to BAdI implementation 

Maximum number of fixed bins (2) reached in storage type KB30

Stor.type: GENR, stor.area: ****, bin type: , stock mvmt: 00000 being examined

Storage type GENR: HUs allowed but not required

Standard putaway behavior (storage type GENR)

Capacity check against storage bin GENR-BIN-003

Weight: 2,500 KG are checked

against free capacity 999,999,999,999.999 KG with tolerance 0 KG

Storage bin GENR-BIN-003 was found (storage type GENR)

HU  was checked successfully

Dest. QTY 25.00000000000000 EA was determined (storage type: GENR, storage bin:GENR-BIN-003)

***** Putaway Warehouse Task Creation for HU 2676 - End

Storage process step IB02 determined for HU 2676

Destination data set to 8010    due to storage control

Warehouse process type set to 3060 due to storage control

*****   Determine source data - start  *****

Source HU 2676 entered; storage type: 9010; storage bin: GR-ZONE

Handling unit type E1 determined

Determine stock in source storage bin GR-ZONE

Source storage bin GR-ZONE determined in storage type 9010

*****   Determine destination data - start *****

Defaults for destination data: StorType:8010 Handling Unit:00000000000000002676

Destination storage type 8010 checked successfully

Destination storage section check is not active in storage type 8010

HU type check is not active in storage type 8010

Alternatives during bin search: 1st alt. Stor.Bin Type, 2nd alt. Storage Sec., 3rd alt. StorType

Access table for bin search:

Storage type: 8010 storage section: **** bin type:  whse pos. eval.: 00000

Start of destination bin search

Stor.type: 8010, stor.area: ****, bin type: , stock mvmt: 00000 being examined

Storage type 8010: HU requirement

Standard putaway behavior (storage type 8010)

Capacity determined from HU 2676

Queue determination started with SFZ1/9010/8010/    /3060/    /    /PTWY

Queue determination number 00001 with X/X/ / /

Queue not determined with SFZ1/9010/8010/    /    /

Queue determination number 00002 with X/ / / /

Queue not determined with SFZ1/9010/    /    /    /

Queue determination number 00003 with  / / /X/

Queue not determined with SFZ1/    /    /    /3060/

Queue determination number 00004 with  /X/ / /

Queue determined with SFZ1/    /8010/    /    /

Queue DECON-COM determined

Engineered Labor Standards Calculation

Work Steps for Selection SFZ1 8010 IB02 A:

Work step sequence: 0002 - step: 0002 - 00000

Condition:  - constant: 5.000 - unit: MIN - formula

Overall result: 5.000 MIN (ELS was calculated: X)

Confirm still-unconfirmed product warehouse tasks for HU 2676

Confirm still-unconfirmed product warehouse tasks for HU 2676

An internal error has occurred

Regards

Ankit Kaushik

Dear All,

We are planning to move to TM 9.3 and EWM 9.3 from our legacy (warehousing and freight) application. Currently the warehouse invoices are generated from the legacy warehousing application. We read that with EWM 9.3 warehouse billing feature is added. So going forward will we be able to use this feature for generating the invoicing using EWM 9.3 and TM 9.3. So the question is whether we will be able to consume the standard TM customer invoicing interface xml file or is there any separate xml file for warehouse billing.

Thanks & Regards

Jayant

Hello gurus,

We just upgraded from EWM 7.02 to EWM 9.2. We use QIE for usage decision. After the upgrade in our QA system, we are getting queues with prefix WMQF#### (#### being WhNo), wtih function module /SCWM/QDECIDED_FUP_PROCESS.

Although the LUWs are not being processed because we haven't activated that queue, the QI process is working normally.

Does anybody know what is the purpose of this queue/function module?

Experts,

I have several products in ERP, all without batch mangement required flag.

Today I ciffed them first time - in EWM, all these products have the flag (so batch is required).

Question is - why the flag is set? Any ideas?

Thanks

Michael

Dear Colleagues,

I've ben trying to create a file that will upload two test HU's (via /scw/psu) with one HU nested level of HU into the other,please see file attached

Nevertheless,the file doesn't get uploaded for whatever reason...I think I have maintained the coloumns '' Handling Unit'& '' correctly,but can you please let me know what you think.

All help is greatly appreciated!!

ADP

Hi,

We have a requirement that the HU will be built first in EWM system and stored in a separate storage type.

In ECC, Sales order & delivery created for same HU contents as order items,

In EWM, We need to pick the already built HU for the components in the delivery.

Can you please provide your suggestions.

Is there anyway to create one Pick HU WT for multiple line items of ODO?

Is there anyway to combine multiple Warehosue requests in one Pick HU WT?

Regards,

Vijay

Hi All,

Is there any way to read characteristic values (Next Inspection Date ) assigned to batch from any EWM table/FM/Class?

Please let me know on this.

Thanks,

Ganesan

Hi All

Please help me resolve this error

when i press the pull the de consolidation group push button i get this error

Good day experts,

we are curently testing our MFS setup in the warehouse. Basically we have a sufficient performance for most of the telegrams. I observed however, that in certain situations EWM takes let's say 3 secs to respond to an inbound telegram (not outbound) while the normal response time is 100-200ms. In such cases I was not able to see any application activity.

I suspect that we had not enough dialog processes configured in the system. I increased them now and set quota for RFCs to 90% (rdisp/max_comm_entries). We'll be testing it this weekend again.

Questions I have:

• How many dialog processes do you run on your EWM machine? I couldn't find any advice here how to calculate these. We will have 384GB main memory on the future machine with 16 cores AAA class CPUs. In the test machine 8 cores and 64GB RAM I have now increased the amount to 60 DIA. Any info here is very welcome, ideally of course if you run MFS
• Anything that I should consider for RFC communication in addition? Maybe in the BC area something worth checking? Any magic switch for RFC communication?
• Is there any way to see a history of RFC connections used? I'm aware of transaction SARFC so far but that's for checking the current load.
• Anyone here that has observed similar behaviour of EWM-MFS meaning it was responsive except certain unpredictable moments?

Kind regards,

Gunter

Hi,

I'm having problem with sampling scheme in EWM.

When I create inbound delivery, with handling units informations, in ECC,

and then check EWM /SCWM/PRDI it looks like the sample-drawing procedure

was completely missed in calculation samples quantities to testing and takes only

fixed value of sample quantity.

I've found BADI QIE_INDIV_SMP_DRWI but I'm not sure if that will solve my issue.

Can You tell me also how to make BADI working, couse it's active and I have debugger

point set in implementation but I don't now how to trigger it.

Regards.

Hello,Guru,

can someone explain to me the s_skip stage means,

how about No.of Reject for skip inspection?

Thank you!

BR

Miriam Zhao

Hello folks, I am getting below error message. Please note the shipping point for plant has been maintained as well as other settings as per SAP documentation. Also the components in production order has been tested for both inbound (against purchase order) and outbound (against sale order). So am a little surprised that am getting below error when outbound delivery for component from production order is failing with below message. Also please note I have also maintained key setting required for EWM PP integration  "In customizing for SAP ERP choose Logistics Execution  Decentralized WMS Integration  Central Processing  Application  Define Interface to Inventory Management and Delivery-Relevant Data"  "Error Message no. /SPE/MAN007 Diagnosis For production supply deliveries to be created in plant PL03,  various data has to be maintained in the supplying and the receiving plant: Shipping point Sales organization Distribution channel (only in the supplying plant) Division (only in the supplying plant) Customer (only in the supplying plant) Vendor (only in the receiving plant) System Response Because of the missing data it is not possible to create a delivery " Any clues or help from others who may have gone through this issue is highly appreciated. Regards

We need to keep the Migo number (or rather a number we get in migo) for all of our imported material.

I do not see a problem achieving this for material with batch but I do not know how to keep this information for non-batch material.

Could maybe this be done with storage bins with Warehouse Management?

Hi,

Want your suggestions as to how we can capture the labor time spent on packing step in POSC.

Requirement is we have to capture the Labor time spent of packing process step.

Our POSC has got: OB01, OB02, OB03 & OB04 process steps.

with OB01 step completion, a pick HU is created and moved to Packing work center.

As a next step when we perform packing in the work center  i.e. reapck the pick HU to Ship HU

System is creating a WT for OB02 step and immediately confirming the same.

So we thought by removing immediate confirmation from Repack WPT: 3040, labor time could be monitored. But system gives us an error when we do this.

Can any one of you suggest how we can acheive this requirement?

BR

Raghava